• Highlights

• Brazil had 24 states with a specific structure to receive, register and monitor reports of violation of ethnic and racial rights in 2024. Acre, Tocantins and Sergipe did not an available structure to receive this type of report.
• In all the 27 states, the office in charge of the Racial Equality Promotion Policy had programs and actions aimed at the Black Population and at Traditional Peoples and Communities of African Descent or People of Terreiros (places of worship). Nevertheless, Gypsies, Indigenous persons, Quilombola persons and other Traditional Peoples and Communities were not included in these programs and actions in some states.
• Only Rio Grande do Norte and Paraná had a Racial Equality fund in 2024; other six received funds from the Union and/or from private entities.
• Eight states had no vacancies reserved for the black, Quilombola, Indigenous or Gypsy populations in public competitite examinantions in 2024.
• The website (24) and telephone (22) were the most common common service channels among state governments, but the Whatsapp was already being used in other 19.
• Internal control offices of 26 states had the function of a Comptroller or worked in the Promotion of Integrity/Combat to Corruption in 2024.
• The number of states with a registry or list of families interested in Housing Programs was the lowest since 2017.
• The number of states providing the service known as "social rent" fell from 17 to between 2020 and 2024. In this period, Bahia, Paraná and Santa Catarina stopped offering this benefit, whereas Mato Grosso and Goiás started to do it.
• Among the 10 states with an intermunicipal train or subway service, less than half had a fleet entirely adapted to persons with disabilities.
• Prevention Programs or Actions against Climate Problems in the Agricultural Sector were present in 24 Federation Units, versus 21 in 2020. Pará and Distrito Federal did not have any and Rondônia did not report its existence.

Of the 27 Federation Units (UF) in the country, 24 had a structure to receive, register and monitor reports of violation of ethnic-racial rights in 2024. An Ombdusman for Human Rights and/or councils, committees, citizenship commissions or the like were the most often mentioned offices receiving these reports, present in 14 states. Acre, Tocantins and Sergipe did not have a structure to receive this type of report. 

Other 17 states had a Racial and Religious Crimes Police Station or similar agency in the capital. In Sergipe, Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro and Paraná also had this structure in other municipalities.

The data, released today (31) by the IBGE, are part of the Survey of Basic State Information (ESTADIC) 2024, which investigated, for the first time, the political and administrative structure of Racial Equality in the 27 Federation Units of Brazil. The survey also presents information about other six topics: Human Resources; Copmputer Science and Communication; Governance; Housing; Transportation and urban Mobility; and Agriculture. The IBGE also released today the Survey of Basic Municipal Information (MUNIC) 2024.

The manager of IBGE’s Social Indicators Surveys, Vânia Pacheco, explains that the absence of a channel for the report of violation of ethnic-racial rights in three states does not mean these localities do not receive reports. “Racial equality is a cross-cutting policy, so these states can offer other report channels, although they are not exclusive for the report of such violations.”

In the 27 FUs, the office in charge of the Racial Equality Promotion Policy developed programs and actions for the Black Population and for Traditional People and Communities of African Descent or People of Terreiros.

Nevertheless, the following population groups were not included in programs and actions promoted by the office responsible for racial equality policies in some states:

• Gypsies (Acre, Pará, Roraima, Tocantins, Rio de Janeiro and Rio Grande do Sul);
• Indigenous persons (Acre, Pará, Ceará, Maranhão, Mato Grosso do Sul, São Paulo);
• Quilombola persons (Acre);
• Other Traditional Peoples and Communities (Pará, Ceará, Maranhão, Pernambuco, Rio Grande do Norte, Mato Grosso do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul).

“It is important to highlight that social assistance, for example, serves this population even so. What the survey shows is that states do not have specific actions aimed at certain population groups. Racial Equality is something recent. As this type of policy is implemented by the federal government, states and municipalities can replicate it,”, Vânia Pacheco analyzes.

Racial equality managers are white in 11 states; black, in nine, and brown, in five states

As for color or race of Racial Equality Promotion managers, white people were the majority (11), followed by black (9), brown (5), Indigenous (1) and quilombola (1) managers. Minas Gerais did not report the color/race of the manager. Women were the majority (24), except for the states of São Paulo, Rio Grande do Sul and Goiás. This result  is different from the other areas surveyed, where the service was mostly managed by men: Transportation (25 men and 1 woman, Rondônia, not reported), Agriculture (24 men and 2 women, Rondônia, not reported) and Housing (18 men and 9 women).

The manager of IBGE’s Survey of Social Indicators analyzes what can contribute to the increased presence of women in Racial Equality management, in comparison with the other topics surveyed. “In general, women are more dedicated to the debate of social issues. But there is still a long way to go, for, in Housing, which is also part of a social agenda, they represent only one third of the management positions,” Vânia explains.

The survey also shows that the 27 Federation Units had specific structures for management of Racial Equality Promotion in 2024, all of them directly linked to the state’s administration. All of them had a State Council for Racial Equality, except for Rio Grande do Sul. Bahia, Rio de Janeiro, Paraná, Santa Catarina and Mato Grosso had a Council for Traditional Peoples and Communities. These states held at least one meeting in the 12 months preceding the survey. The Council of Traditional Peoples and Communities that of African Descent and People of Terreiros were found in Rio Grande do Sul, although they did not have aby meeting in the 12 months preceding the survey.

In relation to the existence of a Committee of Comission for Racial Equality, 16 Federation Units had at least one of them in 2024. The most common committee was Health of the Black Population (8). Tocantins and Ceará, in spite of their committees or commissions, did not have any meeting in the 12 months preceding the survey. There were committees or commissions for Afrotourism and Ethnic or Tourism, Gypsy Peoples’ Cultural Heritage Recognition, Protection ad Preservation of Gypsy Peoples’ Cultural Heritage.

Rondônia and Santa Cataria were the only state without a specific law for topics related to Racial Equality. The other Federation Units had, at least, one of the topics as a specific law. Among the legislation investigated, the most commonly mentioned ones were promotion of racial equality and/or combat to racism (20); vacancies reserved in public competitive examinations for black persons (15); and combat to racial discrimination in the realm of public administration (14). The State Plan for Racial Equality was found in 9 Federation Units, and it was being developed in other 10. In São Paulo, the plan was not regulated by means of a legal instrument.

Only two states have a Racial Equality Fund; six received funds from the Union and/or private entities 

Only Rio Grande do Norte and Paraná had a Racial Equality State Fund, but only in the former was the fund managed by the State Council. In Rio Grande do Norte, the Fund gathered all the budgets from other sources aimed at the Racial Equality Promotion Policy. In Paraná, the Fund was not managed by the Council and did not have all the budget resources aimed at the respective policy. The origin of budgetary resources of the Fund came from the state itself in Rio Grande do Norte and Paraná. 

The 25 Federation Units without the Fund and Paraná, whose Fund did not gather all the budgetary resources aimed at the racial equality promotion, used the state’s own resources. In six Federation Units, besides the State resource, there were funds from the Union and/or private national bodies/entities.

The state budget included the Racial Equality Promotion Policy for 2024 in eight Federation Units (Amapá, Rio Grande do Norte, Pernambuco, Alagoas, Espírito Santo, Paraná, Mato Grosso and Distrito Federal). However, none of them executed 100% of the expected budget. 

Eight states had no reserved vacancies for blacks, Quilombolas, Indigenous persons and gypsies in competitive examinations 

Amazonas, Roraima, Pará, Tocantins, Pernambuco, Minas Gerais, Santa Catarina and Goiás did not have reserved vacancies for black people, Quilombolas, Indigenous persons and gypsies in competitive examinations held in 2024. Another 14 Federation Units, in contrast, included reserved vacancies by means of public notice.

The state administration hired employees in 26 FUs, with 22 hiring people by means of public competitive examinations. Ceará is an exception, for it did not provide answers about civil servants by colo/race, competitive examination and reserved vacancies in Human Resources. Rondônia, Maranhão, Rio Grande do Norte and Paraíba did not organize examinations in 2024.

The number of employed persons employed in direct and indirect state administration, in 2024, was 3,076,223 and, in 2023, 2,986,198, which corresponds to an increase of 3.0%. The proportion of civil servants in direct state administration represented 87.4% (2,687,979) of the total, whereas indirect administration accounted for 12.6% (388,244). 

Website (24) and telephone (22) are still the most commonly used channels among state governments, but the Whatsapp is already used in 19 of them

The most recurrent distance communication channles provided by state governments in 024 were a web page and telephone, found in 24 and 22 Federation Units, respectively. The Whatsapp, included in the survey for for the first time, was used in 19 FUs as service channels aimed at citizens.

The 27 Federation Units had state governments pages on the Internet, and in 24 of them it was possible to search case files and access the online police station. Scheduling medical appointments and exams at public healthcare facilities via state government website was possible in 10 FUs (versus 3 in 2019). Issuing tax payment slips or other payment forms via mobile phone was a service available in 18 Brazilian FUs.

The most frequently used digital platforms were YouTube and Instagram, used by state governments in all the FUs, followed by 26 states, except for Acre. Between 2019 and 2024, the number of Federation Units that had a WhatsApp account increased from 11 to 20. Tik Tok, surveyed for the first time, was found in 18 states in 2024. The use of these platforms for public consultations or enquiries also increased among the UFs, with a change from 7 in  2019 to 18 in 2024. Almost all the state governments (24) updated the content of platforms daily, except for Piauí and Goiás, which updated theirs at least once a week. Pernambuco did not provide information of periodicity.

Almost all the state governments (26) (except for Alagoas) had a website adapted for mobile telephones or designed into a mobile version, whereas this functionality was present in 19 Federation Units in 2019. Except for Paraíba, the websites of state governments had accessibility, an improvement from 2019 (18). Translation of the content into LIBRAS (Brazilian Sign Language) was a functionality available in the websites of 17 states, with a significant increase from 2019 (5).

The unified travel pass, a technology for integrated access to public Transportation, was available in 12 Federation Units, an increase from 2019 (5). All the actions aimed at innovation and creativity recorded increase among the states: maintenance of innovation, coworking facilities or shared work facilities for micro and small-sized companies went from 13 in 2019 to 21 in 2024; training in digital entrepreneurship doubled, from 12 to 24; the establishment (alone or in partnership) and award or call for proposals to allocate resources to innovative companies/creative projects, increased from 19 para 21.

Internal control offices in 26 states perform the functions of Comptroller and Promotion of Integrity/Combat to Corruption

All the Brazilian Federation Units had an organizational structure for internal control in 2024, except for Rondônia, which did not respond to the Governance section of the survey. Among the main functions of the state internal control system were: Comptroller and Promotion of Integrity/Combat to Corruption (26), with an increase from 2019 (23); Government Audit (24), with a decrease compared to 2019 (27); Ombudsman (21), which remained the same as in 2019 (21); and Internal Affairs Office (19), which decreased against 2019 (20).

In all the 26 Federation Units, the state governments made internal control information available online. The most frequently available information, made available in 25 states, referred to the administrative structure of the internal control office, repeating the result of 2019. Nine FUs made public information on consultations regarding government performance indicators (against 4 in 2019), and 17 allow consultations on the monitoring of complaints (versus 14 in 2019). 

Instances of social participation, such as Transparency Councils or similar bodies, became present in 14 Federation Units, versus 10 in 2019. However, in only 9 FUs did the Transparency Councils have meetings in the 12 months prior to the survey.

In 2024, 23 states published files in a user-friendly format

More state governments began making files available in user-friendly formats (csv, ods, xls, and doc) in 2024, compared to 2019. Among the file types are expense reports, found in a more user-friendly format in 23 states in 2024, against 21 in 2019; revenue reports, in 23, against 20; budget reports, in 17, versus 9; employee remuneration and subsidies reports, in 23, versus 17; procurement and bidding reports, in 20, against 15; balance sheets, in 10, versus 8; and accountability reports under the Fiscal Responsibility Law, in 9, compared to 5. There was a drop in the publication of general data in PDF or image formats, indicating a migration towards publishing information in a more user-friendly format.

The 26 Federation Units that reported information regarding Governance (except Rondônia) had specific state laws on procedures and measures to guarantee the right of access to information, in accordance with the LAI (Brazilian Access to Information Law). However, there were some setbacks in the content of the legislation from 2019. For example, the legislation of Acre and Rio Grande do Norte did not establish response deadlines, and that of Piauí and Rio Grande do Norte did not institute procedures for classifying confidential information. In 2019, there were no states that addressed both issues. 

All the 26 participating Federation Units provided physical or virtual means for access to public information. The Citizen Information Service (SIC) was mentioned in 25 of them, against 26 in 2019, and 11 in 2014. Of the 26 states that responded regarding budget and financial execution, 24 (except Tocantins and Mato Grosso) did so in real time and by means of transparency portals.

For the first time, ESTADIC surveyed the state-level structure regarding the implementation of the General Data Protection Law (LGPD). In 2024, 23 Federation Units had an area or person responsible for procedures and policies for the collection, storage, and use of personal data or for the implementation of LGPD guidelines. Roraima and Mato Grosso did not, Rondônia did not provide information, and Bahia was unaware of the situation.

All these 23 Federation Units (UFs) offered online channels for citizens to submit messages regarding the use of their data; 18 provided training courses for their employees on information security; and 18 had specific state laws regarding the LGPD (Brazilian General Data Protection Law).

Number of states with a registry or list of families interested in Housing Programs is the lowest since 2017

A registration or list of families interested in housing programs was found in 18 states, a lower figure than that found in 2017 (19) and 2020 (20). Among these states, 13 carried out or updated the registry between 2019 and 2024, 14 had computerized registry, and 13 included the type of housing benefit sought by the families.

The State Housing Plan was included in the government structure in 24 states. Among the management instruments included in these Plans, Production of New Social Housing Units was the most widespread (23), followed by Promotion of Urbanization and Physical Recovery of Slums and Precarious Settlements (22). Restriction of New Occupations by Housing Settlements in Inadequate Areas (7) was the instrument that appeared the least in the State Plans.

Number of states offering social rent drops to 16

Social rent was granted by 16 state governments in 2024, down from 17 in 2020. During this period, Bahia, Paraná, and Santa Catarina stopped offering this benefit, while Mato Grosso and Goiás began providing it. São Paulo had the largest number of actions and programs implemented in the area of ​​Housing (7 out of 8), only omitting the Supply of Construction Materials. Santa Catarina was the state with the fewest initiatives, with only the Construction of Housing Units among its actions.

Among the actions of the Public Housing Policy in 2024 among the states, the most frequent was Land Regularization (23), after registering 20 in 2017 and 21 in 2020. In second place was Construction of Housing Units (22), followed by Improvement of Housing Units (12), Urbanization of Settlements (10), Acquisition of Housing Units (6), Supply of Construction Materials (4); and Supply of Lots (2). These last two actions reduced their participation for the second time, after being present in 7 states in 2017 and 5 in 2020.

Dos 10 estados com trem ou metrô, menos da metade tem frota totalmente adaptada para deficientes

O Transporte Coletivo Intermunicipal Ferroviário (trem ou metrô) existia em 10 UFs, concentrados no Sudeste (São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro e Minas Gerais) e Nordeste (Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas e Bahia). Além desses estados, o Pará foi o único estado do Norte com esse tipo de transporte. Dos 10 estados com Transporte Ferroviário, apenas 4 tinham frota totalmente adaptada para pessoas com deficiência ou mobilidade reduzida, o que indica uma queda em comparação com 2020 (8). As demais 6 UFs tinham adaptação parcial.

As 10 UFs concediam isenção da tarifa para maiores de 60/65 anos, 8 para menores de 5 anos, 6 para carteiros, 5 para deficientes, 5 para policiais, 3 para estudantes da rede pública, 1 para estudantes da rede privada e 1 para professores. Apenas São Paulo fornecia gratuidade para professores.

Transporte Coletivo Intermunicipal de Ônibus era oferecido em todas as 25 UFs que responderam à pesquisa sobre esse tema. As exceções são Rondônia, que não informou, e Amazonas. Dessas 25 UFs, 7 tinham frota de ônibus totalmente adaptada para pessoas com deficiência ou mobilidade reduzida, resultado ligeiramente melhor que 2020 (6) e 2017 (5). Já 18 estados tinham frota parcialmente adaptada. Em 2020 já não havia estados com frota sem adaptação.

Todos os 25 estados com coletivo intermunicipal de ônibus ofertavam isenção da tarifa para algum grupo populacional. Desse total, 24 estados forneciam gratuidade para pessoas com deficiência, 23 para maiores de 60/65 anos, 18 para menores de 5 anos, 15 para policiais, 9 para estudantes da rede pública, 8 para carteiros, 4 para estudantes da rede privada e 2 para professores. Para professores, apenas São Paulo e Santa Catarina forneciam gratuidade.

Outra modalidade de transporte coletivo intermunicipal investigado foi o Hidroviário, inclusive o realizado por balsas, cuja distribuição estava em 16 UFs. Em 2017, eram 12 estados com esse modal. Todos os estados do Sudeste e Sul ofereciam esse tipo de transporte, bem como a quase totalidade do Norte (Acre, Amapá, Amazonas, Pará e Tocantins). A pesquisa não perguntou sobre acessibilidade e gratuidade para este tipo de transporte.

Agricultura Familiar recebe estímulo da administração pública em 25 estados

Entre os programas e ações de estímulo a pequenos produtores, a Agricultura Familiar recebeu apoio em 25 UFs (ante 23 em 2020), com exceção de Rondônia e do Maranhão, que não responderam à pesquisa. Outras atividades de pequenos produtores que receberam fomento foram Aquicultura (23, ante 19 em 2020) e Agricultura Orgânica (23, ante 20 em 2020), seguidas por Produção de Hortas Comunitárias (21 ante 20 em 2020) e Estímulo à Pesca (19 ante 17 em 2020). O Ceará teve ação de fomento somente para a agricultura familiar. Já 15 estados tinham programas ativos para todas as ações de estímulo a pequenos produtores: Acre, Amazonas, Pará, Amapá, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas, Bahia, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Paraná, Santa Catarina e Mato Grosso do Sul.

Programas de incentivo à agroindústria existiam em 25 das 26 UFs respondentes em 2024, com exceção de Rondônia, que não respondeu, e Roraima. Em 2020, eram 26 UFs. Promoção ou o Apoio a Festividades aconteceu em todas 26 UFs respondentes. Já Premiação ou Reconhecimento aos melhores produtores, em 2024, se deu em 18 UFs, mais disseminado do que em 2020 (16).

Entre as 26 UFs respondentes, 25 tinham, pelo menos, um Programa ou Ação para Facilitar o Acesso a Insumos Agropecuários em 2024. A exceção foi Rondônia, que não respondeu, e Rio de Janeiro. O Fornecimento de Sementes (24), Mudas (22) e Adubos (16 UFs) foram os mais disseminados, repetindo o resultado de 2020. Todas as 26 UFs apresentaram Alguma Forma de Auxílio Voltados à Disponibilização de Maquinário aos Produtores Agropecuários, assim como em 2020. Programas ou Ações de Prevenção contra Problemas Climáticos no Setor Agropecuário estavam presentes em 24 UFs, ante 21 em 2020.

Algum Programa ou Ação de Cunho Social Voltado para o Produtor Agropecuário foi informado pelas 26 UFs respondentes, sendo que 25 tinham Programa de Educação para Área Rural (com exceção do Espírito Santo). Já 22 UFs Fomentavam o Artesanato Junto às Comunidades Rurais, 17 tinham Ações para a Finalidade de Saúde ou Higiene e 12 Ações de Distribuição de Alimentos.